MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2584330546 · doi:10.1182/blood.v114.22.156.156

Apolipoprotein AIV (ApoA-IV) Is a Novel Ligand of Platelet β3 Integrin That Negatively Regulates Platelet Adhesion, Aggregation, and Thrombosis.

2009· article· en· W2584330546 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher M. Spring, Wuxun Jin, Reheman Adili, Guangheng Zhu, Yi‐Min She, Terry D. Cyr, Patrick Tso, Sean Davidson, John Freedman, Heyu Ni

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth CanadaUniversity of TorontoCanadian Blood ServicesSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlateletIntegrinChemistryFibrinogenVon Willebrand factorAdhesionPlatelet activationPlatelet adhesivenessCollagen receptorApolipoprotein BMolecular biologyBiochemistryInternal medicineReceptorPlatelet aggregationMedicineBiologyCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 156 Platelet adhesion and aggregation at sites of vascular injury are key events required for haemostasis and thrombosis. It has been documented that von Willebrand factor (VWF) and fibrinogen (Fg) are required for platelet adhesion and aggregation. However, we previously showed that occlusive thrombi still form in mice deficient for both Fg and VWF (Fg/VWF−/−) via a β3 integrin-dependent pathway. Here, we have investigated novel, non-classical ligands of β3 integrin that may regulate platelet adhesion and aggregation. To identify potential ligand(s) of β3 integrin, latex beads were coated with purified human platelet β3 integrin and incubated with human plasma. Protein(s) specifically associated with β3 integrin were electrophoresed and apolipoprotein AIV (ApoA-IV) was identified by mass spectrometry. We found that ApoA-IV binds to the surface of stimulated platelets, but not to quiescent platelets or β3−/− platelets, and ApoA-IV/platelet association was blocked by the addition of a specific anti-β3 integrin monoclonal antibody. It appears that ApoA-IV binds to, but is not internalized by platelet β3 integrins. ApoA-IV-deficient (ApoA-IV−/−) mice exhibited enhanced platelet aggregation induced by ADP, Collagen, and TRAP in plasma (but not PIPES buffer) compared to wild type (WT) littermates. This enhancement was diminished when ApoA-IV−/− plasma was replaced by WT plasma, indicating that the reduction was due to plasma ApoA-IV and not an unrelated platelet effect. When platelets were incubated with FITC-Fg, ApoA-IV was able to reduce platelet/Fg association, indicating that ApoA-IV may act to displace pro-thrombotic β3 integrin ligand(s). In support of this, ApoA-IV reduced the number of adherent platelets on immobilized Fg in perfusion chamber assays and enhanced thrombus formation was observed when ApoA-IV−/− mouse blood was perfused over collagen. We found that addition of recombinant ApoA-IV inhibited platelet aggregation and thrombus formation in vitro, while the control apolipoprotein ApoA-I did not. Using intravital microscopy, we further demonstrated that early platelet deposition was increased, and the time for thrombus formation and vessel occlusion were shorter in ApoA-IV−/− mice, which can be corrected by recombinant ApoA-IV transfusion. Furthermore, recombinant ApoA-IV inhibited WT platelet aggregation, thrombus formation and enhanced thrombus dissolution both in vitro and in vivo. Our data demonstrate for the first time that ApoA-IV is a novel ligand of platelet β3 integrin that negatively regulates thrombosis. These new data are consistent with the reported association between ApoA-IV and reduced cardiovascular diseases, and establish the first link between ApoA-IV and thrombosis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→