Subfunctionalization of COX4 paralogs in fish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
oxidase (COX) subunit 4 has two paralogs in most vertebrates. The mammalian COX4-2 gene is hypoxia responsive, and the protein has a disrupted ATP-binding site that confers kinetic properties on COX that distinguish it from COX4-1. The structure-function of COX4-2 orthologs in other vertebrates remains uncertain. Phylogenetic analyses suggest the two paralogs arose in basal vertebrates, but COX4-2 orthologs diverged faster than COX4-1 orthologs. COX4-1/4-2 protein levels in tilapia tracked mRNA levels across tissues, and did not change in hypoxia, arguing against a role for differential post-translational regulation of paralogs. The heart, and to a lesser extent the brain, showed a size-dependent shift from COX4-1 to COX4-2 (transcript and protein). ATP allosterically inhibited both velocity and affinity for oxygen in COX assayed from both muscle (predominantly COX4-2) and gill (predominantly COX4-1). We saw some evidence of cellular and subcellular discrimination of COX4 paralogs in heart. In cardiac ventricle, some non-cardiomyocyte cells were COX positive but lacked detectible COX4-2. Within heart, the two proteins partitioned to different mitochondrial subpopulations. Cardiac subsarcolemmal mitochondria had mostly COX4-1 and intermyofibrillar mitochondria had mostly COX4-2. Collectively, these data argue that, despite common evolutionary origins, COX4-2 orthologs of fish show unique patterns of subfunctionalization with respect to transcriptional and posttranslation regulation relative to the rodents and primates that have been studied to date.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".