MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2584379958 · doi:10.2134/jeq2016.07.0253

Stable Isotopes Reveal Rapid Cycling of Soil Nitrogen after Manure Application

2017· article· en· W2584379958 on OpenAlexaff
David Snider, Claudia Wagner‐Riddle, John Spoelstra

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Quality · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrificationManureDenitrificationBiogeochemical cycleAmmoniumEnvironmental chemistryNitrogen cycleNitrateEnvironmental scienceSoil waterSnowmeltChemistryNitrogenAgronomyEcologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the fate of applied nitrogen (N) in agricultural soils is important for agronomic, environmental, and human health reasons, but it is methodologically difficult to study at the field scale. Natural abundance stable isotope measurements (δ15N) were used in this field study with micrometeorological measurements of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions to identify the biogeochemical processes responsible for rapid N transformations immediately after application of liquid dairy manure. Fifteen samplings occurred between 16 Mar. 2012 and 5 Apr. 2013, with a focus on spring manure application (before and after) and a winter snowmelt period. Concentrations and δ15N values of ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3−), N2O, and total N were measured throughout the year. Approximately 56 (±7)% of the NH4+–N applied in the spring could not be accounted for 3 d after manure application and was presumably lost by ammonia volatilization before it was tilled into the soil and/or removed from the inorganic N pool by microbial assimilation. Almost all of the remaining manure‐NH4+ (95 ± 1.1%) was converted within 3 wk to NO3− and N2O by nitrification and nitrifier‐denitrification, respectively. The in situ 15N isotope effect for nitrification (εNitrate–Ammonium) was calculated to be −32.0 (±5.3)‰. Overall, field‐scale measurements of δ15N at natural abundance provided valuable information that was used to distinguish sources of NH4+ (manure vs. soil organic N) and to follow the production and consumption of NO3− and the pathways of N2O production in soil. Core Ideas 49 to 63% of the manure‐NH4+ was volatilized, assimilated, or fixed 3 d after application. Only 4 to 6% of the manure‐NH4+ remained in the soil 3 wk after application. In situ 15N isotope effect for nitrification (ammonium–nitrate) was −32.0 (±5.3)‰. N2O emissions after manure application were produced by nitrifier‐denitrification. The δ15N values showed active production and consumption of NO3− during winter thaw.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental QualitySame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207