Surgery outcomes and functionality in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated functionality statues and surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) contains cervical herniated disc (CHD) and cervical spinal stenosis (CSS) based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). Methods: This was a prospective clinical study a sample of cases with CSM. Patient’s functionality statues and surgical outcome were evaluated based on JOACMEQ scores at two points in time: pre- and postoperative assessments. Results: In all 87 patients were completed the JOACMEQ measure. The mean age of patients was 50.3 (SD=10.2) years. The mean clinical follow-up was 12 months (range 7-37 months). Statistically difference between was observed pre- and postoperative indicating improvements on the outcomes and functionality in all subscales (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between patients with CSM and CHD. Conclusion: The findings suggest that surgery is an efficacious procedure for the treatment of CSM and the functionality statues as measured by the JOACMEQ are higher than prior to surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".