MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2584881455 · doi:10.55601/jsm.v17i2.384

Analisis Perbandingan Akurasi dalam Identifikasi Autism dengan SVM dan Naive Bayes

2016· article· id· W2584881455 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal SIFO Mikroskil · 2016
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEdcuational Technology Systems
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaive Bayes classifierSupport vector machineArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gangguan autisme banyak ditemukan pada anak yang berumur 3 tahun ke bawah. Pendiagnosaan gangguan penyakit ini telah dilakukan dengan menggunakan berbagai metode, terutama metode dalam dunia psikologis. Peneliti menggunakan metode Support Vector Machine (SVM) dan metode Naive Bayes untuk menyelesaikan kasus gangguan autisme yang mengalami kesalahan diagnosa. Dalam hasil penelitian ini dilakukan perbandingan metode Support Vector Machine (SVM) dengan metode Naive Bayes. Metode Support Vector Machine (SVM) menghasilkan rata ?¢â?¬â?? rata klasifikasi 93,12%, sedangkan metode Naive Bayes menghasilkan rata ?¢â?¬â?? rata klasifikasi 73,34%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it