Joint Sparse Beamforming and Network Coding for Downlink Multi-Hop Cloud Radio Access Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a joint design of the routing strategy over the fronthaul network and the transmission strategy over the wireless network in a downlink cloud radio access network (C-RAN), in which the remote radio heads (RRHs) are connected to the central processor (CP) via multi-hop routers. The data-sharing strategy is adopted, where the CP multicasts each user's data to all the RRHs serving this user via the multihop fronthaul network, which then cooperatively serve the users through joint beamforming. Such a setting naturally provides an opportunity for applying the technique of network coding to efficiently reduce the multicast traffic in the fronthaul network. A novel cross-layer optimization framework is then investigated, where the RRH's beamforming vectors as well as the user- RRH association in the physical-layer, and the network coding design in the network-layer are jointly optimized to maximize the throughput of C- RAN subject to fronthaul link capacity constraints. This paper proposes a two-stage algorithm to solve this problem using the techniques of sparse optimization and successive convex approximation. Simulation results are provided to verify the effectiveness of the proposed cross-layer design in the downlink multi- hop C-RAN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".