QoS-Aware Frequency-Space Network Slicing and Admission Control for Virtual Wireless Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless virtualization is a promising approach to foster innovation and prevent the ossification of wireless networks. Within a virtualized wireless network, multiple network slices, or virtual operators (VO), are co- hosted on the same physical infrastructure. A fundamental question in this environment is which multiplexing technique, TDMA, FDMA or SDMA, should be used to slice the network among the VOs. Another related question is how should the stochastic arrival process affect the slicing and QoS criteria. To answer these two questions, we study the problem of QoS-aware joint admission control and network slicing. Due to the NP- hardness of the problem, we approach it using a heuristic algorithm composed of three steps: spectrum allocation, admission control and spatial multiplexing. The proposed algorithm incorporates the effects of QoS and stochastic traffic. We study through simulations the benefits of joint spatial- frequency multiplexing over the static frequency slicing approach. Finally, our simulation results help shed some light on the trade-offs between frequency and spatial multiplexing as well as between QoS and utilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it