A ATUAÇÃO DO COORDENADOR PEDAGÓGICO NA FORMAÇÃO CONTINUADA DO PROFESSOR NA ESCOLA: uma análise das dissertações e teses produzidas no período de 1987 a 2009
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trata-se de uma análise das produções realizadas nos programas de pós-graduação em educação no Brasil no período de 1987 a 2009, sobre a atuação do Coordenador Pedagógico na formação continuada do professor na escola. Como referência para a seleção das obras, recorremos à base de dados da Coordenadoria de Aperfeiçoamento de Professores do Ensino Superior (CAPES). A análise integral das produções revelou singularidades, como se espera de um trabalho dessa natureza, mas também aspectos comuns entre elas. Como pontos recorrentes, destacamos o referencial teórico, o foco no conceito de professor reflexivo, a experiência do autor como Coordenador Pedagógico e o método utilizado. Estes aspectos ficaram evidentes em nosso exame
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".