MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2585120589

Walter Benjamin and its secular uses of theology

2017· article· es· W2585120589 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Lengua y Literatura (National University of Comahue) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicWalter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHermeneuticsMessianismPhilosophyInterpretation (philosophy)AllegoryPolitical theologyDoctrineTheologyGrammarMythical theologyNegationPoliticsEpistemologyNatural theologyLiteratureArt historyLinguisticsHistoryLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Invisible, but simultaneously impregnating and irreducible to an ultimate doctrine, essence or principle, theology in Benjamin takes at the same time the place of philosophical use, of methodological cunning or Metis, and of the deep grammar of Benjaminian language, played out in the various levels of the corpus, specifically: anthropology of experience, philosophy of language and politics of history. If theology in Benjamin can neither be seen as a thematic purpose in the corpus, nor deciphered as an interpretation, as it would happen in the view of a theological hermeneutics of Benjamin’s writings, it should rather be exscripted, through its contextual use, since messianism and theology in Benjamin only define uses and profane thoughts whose impact is similar to the one of allegory, productive parables, and images of thought.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it