ArTSchives: un tremplin vers divers types de musées et vers la création artistique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The article introduces arTSchives, a visual art teaching model that integrates the concepts of museum, archives, and experiential learning. Its purpose is to help understand contemporary artwork of the archival type while proposing artistic creation channels that integrate the concept of archives. The author conducted a content analysis of visual art installations that resulted in a list of potential archive sources. This particular type of teaching promotes the visiting of contemporary art museums as well as natural sciences, human sciences and other types of specialised museums.KEYWORDS: Contemporary; museums; teaching model; Acadian cultural context; art appreciation; archival art; artistic creation; art galleryRésumé: L’article présente un modèle d’enseignement des arts visuels intitulé arTSchives qui intègre les notions de musée, d’archives et d’apprentissage expérientiel. Le but est de faciliter la compréhension des œuvres d’art contemporain de genre archivistique tout en proposant des pistes de création artistique intégrant le concept d’archives. L’auteure a procédé par une analyse de contenu d’installations en arts visuels ce qui a mené à l’énumération d’une liste d’exemples de sources d’archives possibles. Ce type particulier d’enseignement encourage la fréquentation des musées d’art contemporain ainsi que des musées de sciences naturelles, sciences humaines et autres musées spécialisés.MOTS CLES: Contemporain; musées; modèle d’enseignement; contexte culturel acadien; appréciation artistique; art archivistique
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".