MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2585258461 · doi:10.1109/icinfa.2016.7831804

Cell out-of-plane rotation control using a cell surgery robotic system equipped with optical tweezers manipulators

2016· article· en· W2585258461 on OpenAlexaff
Mingyang Xie, Shuxun Chen, James K. Mills, Yong Wang, Yunhui Liu, Dong Sun

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical tweezersTweezersRotation (mathematics)Computer scienceOpticsPhysicsMaterials scienceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single cell surgery has been gaining increasing attention due to its extensive applications in physiological and pathological of cell research. Orientation control of biological cell is a basic and vital technique required in cell surgery procedures. By adjusting the orientation of the cell appropriately, the components and sites of interest can be captured by a microscope, such that further analysis, diagnosis, extraction and treatment can be performed. Cell rotation reduces the potential unwanted damage to components of cell during cell surgery. Currently, orientation control of biological cells is typically carried out with manual operations. With ongoing trend towards automated manipulation, a framework that can automate the multi-axis rotation of suspended biological cells is urgently needed. In this paper, we utilize two optical traps, generated by robotically controlled holographic optical tweezers (HOT), as two special manipulators to manipulate the cell for out of image plane rotation. By utilizing the T-matrix approach and experimental calibration, the relationship between the relative vertical height of the optical traps and the rotational angle is characterized. A visual feedback controller is further developed to rotate the cell to the pre-determined orientation accurately. Experiments are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsFrench-language works237,207