Corrigendum: Characteristics of the total disintegration events of emulsion heavy target nuclei caused by O<sup>16</sup> and <sup>28</sup>Si nuclei at high energies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present paper deals with the interactions of 16 O and 28 Si nuclei with emulsion heavy target nuclei (silver (Ag) and bromine (Br)) at 4.5A GeV/c. The results have been analyzed to identify interesting characteristics of the total disintegration (TD) events produced in these interactions. Events having a number of heavily ionizing particles Nh 28 have been selected in this study. The integral multiplicity distributions for the disintegrated particles from the target nuclei have been used to separate the inelastic interactions with the free hydrogen (H), the light (CNO), and the heavy (AgBr) nuclei. The average multiplicities of the different secondary particles emitted in these interactions have been compared with the corresponding ones of different projectiles nearly at the same momentum. The average multiplicity of the grey particles is found to increase with the mass of the projectile, while the average multiplicity of the black particles is found to decrease with increasing mass of the projectile; this result agrees with the prediction of the fireball model. Also, the dependence of the shower, grey, and black particles produced in the TD events on the mass of the projectile has been studied. Moreover, the dependence of the probability of the TD for the projectile mass as well as the target fragments has also been discussed. The results show that the multiplicity distributions of the shower, grey, and black particles present a Gaussian distribution. Finally, the linear dependence of the grey and compound multiplicities on the black, heavy, and shower particles has also been observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".