MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2585456897

Analysis and Numerical Methods for Algebraic Riccati Equations Associated with Regular M-Matrices

2015· dissertation· en· W2585456897 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Di Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueoURspace (University of Regina) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Regina
KeywordsMathematicsAlgebraic Riccati equationApplied mathematicsAlgebraic numberRiccati equationAlgebra over a fieldAlgebraic equationPure mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsDifferential equationNonlinear system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thesis is a further study about algebraic Riccati equations for which the four coe cient matrices form a regular M-matrix K. We prove a property about minimal nonnegative solutions of such an algebraic Riccati equation and its dual equation. And we show that Newton's method, SDA, ADDA are well-de ned and quadratically convergent in non-critical case. Then we prove that ADDA is linearly convergent with rate 1=2 in critical case. As compared to earlier work on solving regular MARE by ADDA, the results we present here are more general. This thesis extends the knowledge of doubling algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueoURspace (University of Regina)Same topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207