Assessment of flow‐mediated dilatation in the superficial femoral artery using a sustained shear stress stimulus via calf plantar‐flexion exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? The aim was to establish the ability of a newly designed leg exercise technique to produce sustained elevations in shear rate that stimulate flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) in the superficial femoral artery and to determine the repeat trial stability of the FMD response. What is the main finding and its importance? Calf plantar-flexion exercise can be used to increase shear stress and stimulate FMD in the superficial femoral artery. However, the magnitude of FMD varied systematically when multiple trials were repeated in short succession. The superficial femoral artery (SFA) is susceptible to vascular disease, and a technique to assess flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) in this vessel in response to a sustained shear stress stimulus could provide important information about endothelial function. The aim of this study was to establish the ability of a newly designed SFA leg exercise-FMD (LEX-FMD) technique to produce sustained elevations in shear rate, which stimulate FMD, and to determine the repeat trial stability of the FMD response. The SFA FMD stimulated by reactive hyperaemia (RH) and calf plantar-flexion exercise (LEX) was assessed via ultrasound in 19 healthy men (n = 10) and women (n = 9). The two experimental visits included either four trials of LEX-FMD or four trials of RH-FMD. The shear stress stimulus was estimated as the shear rate (blood velocity/SFA diameter). Results are expressed as the means ± SD. The LEX steady-state shear rate was consistent between trials (P = 0.176), whereas the RH shear rate area under the curve was higher in trial 1 versus trials 2-4 (P < 0.05). The %RH-FMD (four-trial mean 4.9 ± 2.5%) and absolute RH-FMD were not significantly different between trials (P = 0.465 and P = 0.359, respectively). Both %LEX-FMD and absolute LEX-FMD were higher during trial 3 (4.8 ± 3.4%) than trial 1 (3.6 ± 2.7%; P = 0.026 and P = 0.026, respectively). The magnitude of RH-FMD and LEX-FMD did not differ (P = 0.241). These results indicate that calf plantar-flexion exercise can be used to increase shear stress and stimulate FMD in the SFA. However, although SFA RH-FMD was stable across four trials, LEX-FMD varied systematically when multiple trials were repeated in rapid succession.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".