PENGARUH KUALITAS MAKANAN, KUALITAS LAYANAN DAN LINGKUNGAN FISIK TERHADAP KEPUASAN DAN BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS ( STUDI DI MÉTIS RESTAURANT )
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study were to describe and analyze the influence of the quality of food, quality of service and the physical environment on satisfaction and behavioral intentions. The study was conducted in Metis Restaurant, using 150 visitors as sample. Methods of data collection using questionnaires, in which data is analyzed using Structural Equation Model (SEM). Results from this study indicate that quality of food, quality of service and physical environment has a positive and significant direct influence, both for customer satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Satisfaction also has positive and significant effect on behavioral intentions directly.The implication of this study, that the three aspects of dining experiences were able to achieve satisfaction and in the end would create behavioral intentions. The restaurant was suggested to to improve the dinning experience aspects, such as menu variety, friendliness and the lightning level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it