MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2585894045 · doi:10.1136/bmj.j533

Pregnancy after bariatric surgery: screening for gestational diabetes

2017· editorial· en· W2585894045 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Safwaan Adam, Basil J. Ammori, Handrean Soran, Akheel A. Syed

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2017
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGestational diabetesSleeve gastrectomyPregnancyWeight lossObesityGastric bypass surgerySurgeryDiabetes mellitusObstetricsWeight Loss SurgeryGastric bypassGestationInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Safer alternatives are needed to traditional test Obesity affects a quarter of adult women in the UK, western Europe, and Canada, and a third in the US. More women than men have bariatric surgery every year,1 and most are of childbearing age. Of 12 869 women in the UK who had primary bariatric surgery in 2011-13, 8469 (66%) were younger than 50.1 Furthermore, fertility in obese women generally improves after bariatric surgery as menstrual irregularity and ovulatory problems resolve with weight loss.23 Thus, increasing numbers of women with obesity start or complete their families after bariatric surgery. Despite weight loss after surgery, many women still require screening for gestational diabetes mellitus during pregnancy. A history of bariatric surgery has important implications for the choice of test since an oral glucose tolerance test can trigger dumping syndromes, with serious adverse effects. The two most common primary bariatric procedures, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (54%) and sleeve gastrectomy (20%),1 can both cause …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicBariatric Surgery and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207