Calcite nanoparticles as possible nano-fillers for reinforcing the plaster of Palazzetto Alessandro Lancia in Rome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, CaCO3 nanoparticles were synthesized and then applied on the plaster of Palazzetto Alessandro Lancia, in Rome. CaCO3 (A) and CaCO3 (B) were fabricated by using urease enzyme and the miniemulsion strategy, respectively. Samples A and B were characterized by Transmission Electron Microscopy, X-Ray Diffraction and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Then, the dispersions were applied on the plaster and the SEM equipped by the Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis was used for characterization. Interesting results were obtained in recovering the mechanical properties of the plaster, not altering their permeability to water and perfectly keeping the wall transpiration but only in presence of nanostructured Calcite (A). This latter resulted in a high quality sample, if compared with the CaCO3 (B) (that also contains Vaterite compound). © 2016, Ecozone, OAIMDD. All rights reserved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".