MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2585929237

Finding Characters that will Differentiate Six Very Similar Packera (Ragwort) Taxa in the Upper Midwest

2013· article· en· W2585929237 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erika Magnusson

Bibliographic record

VenueCornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaxonBiologyGenealogyGeographyEcologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The North American plant genus Packera is a member of the Asteraceae (Sunflower Family). Most of the approximately 70 Packera species are morphologically distinct and occur in different geographic areas or microhabitats. However populations of the widespread, P. paupercula complex are variable in morphology, chromosome number, and ecological requirements. One undescribed group of tetraploid populations currently recognized in P. paupercula occurs in the Upper Midwest and Canada, including northern Minnesota. These “Northern Tetraploids” may merit recognition at the species or varietal level. Northern Tetraploids are very similar in morphology to other diploid members of the P. paupercula complex in our region (varieties paupercula, savannarum, and pseudomentosa) and to P. plattensis a tetraploid prairie species found in western Minnesota. As part of a larger study that seeks to describe and classify the Northern Tetraploids, I measured 13 characters on 82 herbarium specimens that include these six Packera taxa. I used one way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to determine which characters best differentiate the taxa. While no one character will differentiate among all taxa, mean flowering date, involucre length, ray length, and ratios derived from basal leaf measurements were significantly different in some pairwise comparisons. Used in combination, these characters will provide useful information for biologists attempting to identify these taxa in the field. Furthermore, naming a new species or variety requires valid publication that includes a thorough morphological description and a key to related species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato)Same topicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207