MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586043868 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2016.7842332

To Shout or Not to Shout: Performance of Power Ramping during Random Access in LTE/LTE-A

2016· article· en· W2586043868 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunications linkPreambleComputer scienceRandom accessLTE AdvancedComputer networkChannel (broadcasting)Power (physics)Control channelPower controlPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power ramping is one of the mechanisms proposed to help alleviate congestion during random access in LTE cells. We evaluate its performance taking into account preamble SINR considerations as well as Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) deficiency. Our results show that power ramping can speed up access at small to moderate loads, but that it is actually detrimental at moderate to high loads, with the ability to cause abrupt onset of saturation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.782

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207