MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586076362 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx002.284

P158 Pouchitis in paediatric ulcerative colitis: a multicentre longitudinal cohort study from the Porto IBD working group of ESPGHAN

2017· article· en· W2586076362 on OpenAlexaff
Chani Topf‐Olivestone, E. Orlanski Meyer, Oren Ledder, M. Friedman, Iris Dotan, Lars Folmer Hansen, Angelika Kindermann, Amit Assa, Kaija‐Leena Kolho, Sanja Kolaček, Eytan Wine, Caterina Strisciuglio, Marina Aloi, Richard Hansen, Harland S. Winter, Lissy de Ridder, F. Smets, Dan Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPouchitisMedicinePancolitisUlcerative colitisInternal medicineColectomyInflammatory bowel diseasePouchGastroenterologyCohortAnastomosisProctocolectomySurgeryDiseaseColorectal cancerCancerColonoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Risk factors associated with the development of pouchitis in adults after formation of an ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) include severe inflammation at diagnosis, upper gastrointestinal (UGI) involvement, backwash ileitis, pancolitis, and extra-intestinal manifestations (EIM), all of which are more common in paediatric-onset ulcerative colitis (UC). We thus aimed to assess outcomes and explore risk factors for pouchitis in children who underwent IPAA before the age of 18 years. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 17 paediatric IBD centres from the Porto group of ESPGHAN. Electronic REDcap system was used, including explicit baseline characteristics, management, surgical information and medical short and long term follow up. Results: A total of 129 children who underwent IPAA were included (50% male; 93% UC and 7% IBDU, mean age at diagnosis 10.5±4.2 years, median disease duration to colectomy 17 months (IQR 8–35.5 months) and median follow-up after pouch formation 36 months (IQR 21–64 months). Eighty-six children (67%) developed pouchitis during follow-up. In 33 (26%) the pouchitis was chronic, 10 of whom (8%) had Crohn's-like disease of the pouch. Median time from pouch formation to the first episode of pouchitis was 10.5 months (IQR 6–22); in 54% of cases the first episode occurred within one year. The experience of the surgeon was strongly associated with development of chronic pouchitis (8/54 (15%) in surgeons with ≥10 surgeries/year vs 11/27 (41%) in surgeons with <10/year, p=0.013). There was no significant added benefit to surgeon experience greater than 10 surgeries/year. Other variables that were associated with development of pouchitis included: younger age at diagnosis (mean 9.9±4.3 vs 11.7±3.7 years; p=0.014), longer disease duration prior to colectomy (median 22 (IQR 10–39) vs 13 (6–29) months; p=0.026), and Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity (7/15 Ashkenazi patients with chronic pouchitis vs 21/103 patients of other ethnicity; p=0.046). The following variables did not predict pouchitis: UGI involvement, disease extent, backwash ileitis, EIM, pANCA positivity, IPAA type, and high PUCAI score at diagnosis/surgery). Multivariate logistic regression showed that chronic pouchitis was associated with male gender (HR=4.3, 95% CI 1.2–14.7) and surgeon experience (<10surgeries per/year) (HR=5.2, 95% CI 1.5–18.6) while controlling for age and disease duration. Conclusions: UC patients who underwent IPAA during childhood developed pouchitis at a higher rate than usually described in adults. Surgeon experience seems to be an important controllable predictor of chronic pouchitis and should be taken into consideration in paediatric patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207