MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Patterns of diagnostic imaging and cumulative radiation exposure among long-term young adult cancer survivors.

2012· article· en· W2586110468 on OpenAlexaffabout
Corinne Daly, David R. Urbach, Thérèse A. Stukel, Wayne Deitel, Paul C. Nathan, Lawrence Paszat, Nancy N. Baxter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSt. Michael's HospitalInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCancer registryPoisson regressionMalignancyCancerRadiological weaponPopulationYoung adultRetrospective cohort studyRadiation therapyNuclear medicineSurgeryInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

6027 Background: Young adults surviving a diagnosis of malignancy have a considerable life expectancy, however, little is known about radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging in these patients. This study aims to describe patterns of imaging and radiation exposure in young adult cancer survivors (YAS) and cancer-free controls in Ontario, Canada. Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective study. Young adults aged 20-44 diagnosed with an invasive malignancy between 1992 and 1999 who lived at least 5 years without recurrent disease were identified in the Ontario Cancer Registry. YAS were matched 1:5 to randomly selected cancer-free controls on calendar year of birth, sex, and geographic location. Radiological procedures were identified through Ontario Health Insurance Plan administrative data. The rate at which individuals underwent diagnostic procedures after surviving 5-years was compared between survivors and controls using Poisson regression. Cumulative radiation exposure due to computed tomography (CT) and standard x-ray were calculated. Results: 20,911 YAS and 104,524 controls had a median of 13.5 years observation time after cancer diagnosis/referent date. The rate of CT scanning after 5 year survival was higher in YAS (rate ratio= 3.59, 95% CI: 3.46 – 3.73) and varied according to malignancy type (Table). Over the course of diagnosis, treatment and surveillance to 10 years, the average YAS was exposed to 33.8 mSv of radiation, 4.4 times the radiation exposure an individual in the general population received. 47% of YAS cumulative dose was attributed to exposure 5 years or more after diagnosis. Conclusions: YAS undergo imaging and are exposed to diagnostic irradiation at a significantly higher rate than controls even after 5 years of recurrence free survival. Alternative imaging techniques not associated with exposure to radiation should be considered for these patients. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207