MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586116352 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckt126.009

Social capital and adolescent smoking: an application of a cross-classified multilevel model

2013· article· en· W2586116352 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bart De Clercq, TK Pfoertner, FJ Elgar, Anne Hublet, Lea Maes

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial capitalMultilevel modelPsychologyEnvironmental healthMedicineSociologyStatisticsSocial scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The aetiology of adolescent substance use is multifactorial. Particularly, the effects of the interface of family, school, and neighborhood, is ill understood, and the concept of social capital may be useful in exploring this interrelationship. The present study aims to consider these contextual social capital influences on adolescent cigarette smoking. Methods The data comes from the 2005/6 Flemish Health Behavior among School-aged Children survey, which is part of the international Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children survey: a WHO Collaborative Cross-National Study. Self-completion questionnaires were administered in schools using a standardized research protocol. Social capital was assessed by structural and cognitive components of family social capital, a four-factor school social capital scale and a cognitive neighborhood social capital scale. A non-hierarchical multilevel model was fitted in MLwiN 2.25, with 5169 adolescents nested within a cross-classification of 41 schools and 204 neighborhoods. Results A cross-classified logistic regression model showed significant variation in adolescent regular smoking between schools, but not between communities. Only structural family social capital and cognitive school social capital variables (vertical and trust) negatively related to regular smoking (p < 0.05). Additionally, a truly contextual effect was found for vertical social capital on the school level (p < 0.05). No interactions between socio-economic status indicators and social capital variables were found. Conclusions The present study suggests that previously observed community-level effects on adolescent smoking may be a consequence of unmeasured confounding. Distinguishing nested contexts of social capital is important because their associations with smoking differ. School policy makers should invest in vertical ties between pupils and teachers because they have a protective effect on smoking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207