MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2586150132 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now212.343

GENT-37. THE GENETICS DRIVING RADIATION INDUCED MENINGIOMAS

2016· article· en· W2586150132 on OpenAlexaff
Peter J. Tonge, Sameer Agnihotri, Shahrzad Jalali, Arnavaz Danesh, Jeff Bruce, Trevor J. Pugh, Ken Aldape, Gelareh Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeningiomaBiologyExomeExome sequencingCarcinogenesisMeningesTranscriptomeCancer researchCancerGeneticsComputational biologyBioinformaticsGeneMedicineMutationPathologyNeuroscienceGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One-third of all primary central nervous system tumors in adults are meningiomas, which arise from the meninges. Although the majority of meningioma cases are not associated with an environmental risk factor, it is well established that individuals receiving radiation treatment to the CNS are susceptible to radiation-induced meningiomas. The genomic integrity of spontaneous meningiomas has been extensively profiled by whole genome sequencing and exome sequencing, providing a well-developed catalogue of meningioma associated mutations. In contrast, a comprehensive understanding of the molecular changes associated with RIMs is undetermined. We have compiled a cohort of radiation-induced meningiomas and molecularly characterized their methylome, transcriptome and mutational signatures. The integration of these three platforms at base-pair resolution has facilitated the identification of molecular changes that drive oncogenesis. We reveal that radiation induced meningiomas possess a unique mutational signature that is distinct from spontaneous meningiomas. This distinct mutational signature is dominated by genomic rearrangements that generate novel fusion genes and disrupt tumor suppressors. These findings have serious implications for the development of therapies focused towards the treatment of radiation-induced meningiomas. In summary, this is the largest cohort of profiled meningiomas to date, providing a robust characterization of distinct radiation induced meningioma features that can be exploited for the development of future therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→