MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2586151462 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx002.211

P085 The effect of vitamin D on macrophage function and polarization in Crohn's disease

2017· article· en· W2586151462 on OpenAlexaffabout
Serge Dionne, Carl Frédéric Duchatellier, Ernest G. Seidman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD14PhagocytosisMacrophageCD16ChemotaxisFlow cytometryImmunologyVitamin D and neurologyPeripheral blood mononuclear cellM2 MacrophageTumor necrosis factor alphaCCL2ChemistryStimulationCrohn's diseaseMacrophage-activating factorMedicineInflammationIn vitroChemokineInternal medicineCD3Immune systemDiseaseBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Defective bacterial clearance by macrophages is believed to play an important role in Crohn's disease (CD). Phenotypes of macrophages include inflammatory M1 and anti-inflammatory M2. Vitamin D has been shown to reduce colitis severity but the mechanisms remain unclear. The effect of Vitamin D on M1 and M2 macrophages in IBD has not been investigated. The aim was to identify possible differences in M1 and M2 macrophages between CD patients and controls and to determine the effect of 1,25 vit D on macrophage function and phenotype markers. Methods: PBMC were isolated from peripheral blood of 45 CD patients and 33 controls not taking vitamin D supplements. REB approval and patient consent was obtained. Monocytes were isolated using CD14 microbeads. M1 and M2 type macrophages were generated by culturing of monocytes in the presence of GM-CSF and M-CSF, respectively. Cytokines were determined by ELISA following stimulation with 100 ng/ml LPS. Phagocytosis was determined by measuring the uptake of FITC-latex beads using flow cytometry. Chemotaxis assays were performed in transwell plates. Expression of M1 and M2 markers was determined by qPCR. Results: No difference in chemotaxis or phagocytosis was observed in CD macrophages compared to controls. M2 displayed greater phagocytic activity than M1 (94.6% vs 80.3%). Phagocytosis was not altered after treatment with 1,25D. M1 migrated in slightly higher numbers toward CCL2 and fMLP compared to M2. Vit D slightly increased migration of both types toward fMLP (+18–26%). LPS-induced production of TNFα, IL-12p40 and IL-10 was comparable between macrophages in CD and controls. M1 produced higher amounts of IL-12p40 and TNFα compared to M2 (p<0.0005 and p<0.05, respectively) whereas IL-10 production was greater in M2 (1566 vs 152 pg/ml, p<0.005). Preincubation with 1,25D greatly decreased IL-12p40 production by M1 (-64.9%, p<0.0005) as well as that by M2 (-100%, p<0.05). 1,25D also decreased TNFα production by M1 (-49.6%, p<0.05) and IL-10 by M2 (-28.2%, p<0.05). M2 macrophages preferentially express F13A1, PTGS2, CD163, CXCL10, CD14 and MMP2, whereas TGFβ, CCL1 and CYP27B1 expression was higher in M1. Marker expression was similar between CD and control macrophages. M1 and M2 markers were not differentially modulated by vit D. Conclusions: Peripheral blood derived macrophage chemotaxis and phagocytosis in CD is similar to those from controls. The main effect of 1,25D was to markedly decrease pro-inflammatory cytokine production from M1 macrophages. However, 1,25D did not modulate macrophage polarization to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. This study was supported by a grant from the Dairy Farmers of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicVitamin D Research Studies→French-language works237,207→