MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586175175 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2017.2664041

Bandwidth Estimation From Multiple Level-Crossings of Stochastic Signals

2017· article· en· W2586175175 on OpenAlexaff
Dominik Rzepka, M. Pawlak, Dariusz Kościelnik, Marek Miśkowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBandwidth (computing)EstimatorGaussianMathematicsAlgorithmSignal processingComputer scienceStatisticsDigital signal processingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by a broad range of potential applications in event-driven signal processing inference, we examine a class of spectral moments estimators derived from multiple level-crossings of a stationary Gaussian stochastic signal as well as non-Gaussian signals being monotone transformations of the Gaussian signal. The established spectral moments estimators are used to obtain estimates of the stochastic signal bandwidth. Both the mean-squared bandwidth and the absolute bandwidth are taken into account. Also the notion of the power bandwidth is introduced and its estimation is examined. We prove that the proposed estimates are consistent as the length of the observed time interval is increasing. The accuracy of the proposed bandwidth estimation methods from multiple level-crossings is assessed in simulation studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207