MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586199840

Active Listening: The Cultural Politics of Magnetic Recording Technologies in North America, 1945-1993.

2016· dissertation· en· W2586199840 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDeep Blue (University of Michigan) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive listeningPoliticsCultural politicsPolitical scienceSociologyCommunicationLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the late 1940s to the mid 1990s, the use of magnetic tape recorders provoked aesthetic, social, and political debates about the decentralization of sonic production. At the very moment that postwar mass culture seemed most ascendant and critics began to identify it as a coherent object of study and scorn, reel-to-reel tape recorders allowed users to reproduce and manipulate mass-produced sounds emanating from radio and recording studios, as well as the sounds of their households, their communities, and the larger world outside their homes. Many non-professional tape users, non-commercial sonic researchers, and hobbyist audio networkers would come to believe that they could be more than passive recipients of culture industry products and the dominant ideologies that they transmitted; through an active engagement with tape, they hoped to teach listeners to become producers themselves. Listening to their works produced via tape, reading their voluminous writings, and combing their archival collections for evidence of wider connections to their practices, I argue that such tape enthusiasts developed a set of media theories through a self-reflexive recording practice I call active listening. This dissertation follows hobbyists and professional recordists ranging from New York City folklorist and advertiser Tony Schwartz, composer and educator R. Murray Schafer and his World Soundscape Project in Vancouver, British Columbia, and the Iowa City-based audio collective the Tape-beatles, who all proposed multiple forms of engagement with, against, and about mass culture. They made structural critiques of commercial culture industries for separating producers from consumers in the name of profits, perceptual arguments about the capacity for sound to activate new political imaginaries, and aesthetic moves that aimed to reintegrate presumably alienated listening subjects. Not only did the ubiquity of mass culture throughout North America give listeners a shared vocabulary, but the act of appropriating and manipulating sounds on tape fostered a self-consciousness about how mass culture worked and how it might be made to work differently. Such forms of engagement both attempted to eliminate boundaries between the production and consumption of mass culture and bolstered an ideological investment in the idea of mass culture as a passive and alienating force.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it