Parametric Modeling of Microwave Components Using Adjoint Neural Networks and Pole-Residue Transfer Functions With EM Sensitivity Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a pole-residue-based adjoint neuro-transfer function (neuro-TF) technique with electromagnetic (EM) sensitivity analysis for parametric modeling of EM behavior of microwave components with respect to changes in geometrical parameters. The purpose is to increase model accuracy by utilizing EM sensitivity information and to speed up model development by reducing the number of training data required for developing the model. The proposed parametric model consists of original and adjoint pole-residue based neuro-TF models. New formulations are derived for calculating the second-order derivatives for training the adjoint pole-residue-based neuro-TF model. An advanced pole-residue tracking technique is proposed to exploit the sensitivity information to track the splitting of poles as geometrical parameters change. This pole-residue tracking technique allows the model to bridge the differences of the orders of transfer function over different regions of the geometrical parameters, and ultimately form smooth and continuous functions between the pole/residues and the geometrical variables. The proposed technique addresses the challenges of tracking pole splitting when training data are limited. By exploiting the sensitivity information, the proposed technique can speed up the model development process over the existing pole-residue parametric modeling method which does not use sensitivity analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".