MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Distinct Mechanisms of Idiopathic and Thienopyridine-Assocaited Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Purpura: Final Results from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Risk Factors for Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (SERF-TTP) Study.

2008· article· en· W2586235704 on OpenAlexaff
Charles L. Bennett, Anaadriana Zakarija, Hau C. Kwaan, Dilip K. Pandey, Paul R. Yarnold, John Cursio, Robert C. Soltysik, Thanh Ha Luu, Elizabeth Richey, Ivy Weiss, June M. McKoy, Dennis W. Raisch, Thomas J. Raife, Patricia M. Carey, Ravi Sarode, Joseph E. Kiss, Constance Danielson, Bruce C. McLeod, Thomas L. Ortel, Jeffery Winters, William F. Clark, Nicholas Bandarenko

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsCanadian Apheresis GroupLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsADAMTS13ThienopyridineMedicineThrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraRituximabInternal medicineGastroenterologyPlateletClopidogrelAspirin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background : Many idiopathic thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura (TTP) patients have severe deficiency of ADAMTS13, an enzyme that cleaves ultralarge von Willebrand multimers. We recently reported that thienopyridine-associated TTP is characterized by an immunologic pathway with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency and a non-immunologic pathway with higher ADAMTS13 activity levels. We now compare findings for idiopathic and thienopyridine-associated TTP patients. Methods : Clinical findings and laboratory findings were evaluated for 51 idiopathic and 39 thienopyridine-associated TTP. Results: Clinical findings were similar between idiopathic and thienopyridine-associated TTP for both severe ADAMTS13 deficient and non-deficient patients. Differences were noted in gender and age, relapse rates, and survival. Conclusion : Among TTP patients with ADAMTS13 deficiency, relapses are frequent in idiopathic TTP patients and Rituximab may be useful, while for thienopyridine-associated TTP patients spontaneous relapse are rare as long as no re-exposure occurs. Among ADAMTS13 non-deficient patients, survival is high following therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for idiopathic patients but not for thienopyridine-associated TTP patients. Despite similarities, idiopathic and thienopyridine associated TTP probably have different initiating factors. ADAMTS13 activity and clinical characteristics in idiopathic and thienopyridine-associated TTP Idiopathic severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (n=29) †Thienopyridine severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (n=26) Idiopathic non-severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (n=22) †Thienopyridine non-severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (n=13) *p<0.05 for comparison of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency versus non-severe ADAMTS13 deficiency. †Thienopyridine-associated TTP clinical and presenting neutralizing autoantibody data was summarized from the Journal of the American College of Cardiology publication by Bennett et al. in 2007. ‡Thienopyridine-associated TTP remission autoantibody data was summarized Tsai et al, 2002, Bennett et al, 2000, and Orimo et al, 2002, and included 3 patients. §Data from average of ADAMTS13 deficient and non-deficient cohorts. Mean Age 41 67 47 60 Sex (% female) 79% 54% 86% 39% Platelet count/mm3 (mean)* 18,978 9,269 51,409 35,000 Platelet count <20,000/mm3* 69% 96% 23% 38% Hemoglobin (mg/dl; mean) 8.5 8.3 9.0 8.4 Creatinine (mg/dl; mean)* 1.5 2.2 3.2 3.0 Creatinine >2.5 mg/dl* 11% 27% 48% 46% 30-day survival 96% 85% 90% 62% Long-term relapse* 42% 8% 0% 0% Neutralizing autoantibodies to ADAMTS13 (prior to TPE) § 79% 100% 27% 0% Neutralizing autoantibodies to ADAMTS 13 (measured at remission) § 55% 33%‡ 33% 0%

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207