MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586256424 · doi:10.1039/c6dt03867k

PtI<sub>2</sub>(DACH), the iodido analogue of oxaliplatin as a candidate for colorectal cancer treatment: chemical and biological features

2017· article· en· W2586256424 on OpenAlexaff
Damiano Cirri, Serena Pillozzi, Chiara Gabbiani, Jacopo Tricomi, Gianluca Bartoli, Matteo Stefanini, Elena Michelucci, Annarosa Arcangeli, Luigi Messori, Tiziano Marzo

Bibliographic record

VenueDalton Transactions · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsIONICS Mass Spectrometry (Canada)
FundersAssociazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul CancroEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology
KeywordsOxaliplatinColorectal cancerChemistryMedicinal chemistryCancer researchCombinatorial chemistryCancerInternal medicineBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(DACH) induced cytotoxicities roughly comparable to those of oxaliplatin in three representative CRC cell lines. Moreover, it was able to trigger cell apoptosis, to an extent even better than cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Overall, a rather promising picture emerges for this novel Pt drug that merits, in our opinion, a deeper and more extensive preclinical evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalton TransactionsSame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207