MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586266679 · doi:10.2118/185058-ms

Experimental Investigation for Microscale Stimulation of Shales By Water Imbibition During the Shut-in Periods

2017· article· en· W2586266679 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aadish Gupta, Mingxiang Xu, Hassan Dehghanpour, Doug Bearinger

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Unconventional Resources Conference · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImbibitionOil shaleKeroseneHydraulic fracturingGeologyPorosityGeotechnical engineeringPermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum engineeringMineralogyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Imbibition of water into the shale matrix is known as the primary reason for inefficient water recovery after hydraulic fracturing treatments. The hydration of clay minerals may induce microfractures in clay-rich shale samples. The increased porosity and permeability due to induced microfractures has been considered to be partly responsible for 1) excessive water uptake of gas shales, and 2) increase in hydrocarbon production rate after prolonged shut-in periods. To test this hypothesis, it is necessary to measure imbibition-induced strain and stress under representative laboratory conditions. In this study, we conduct laboratory tests to 1) measure the strain and stress induced by water imbibition in gas shales and 2) investigate the effect of confining load on the rate of water imbibition. We conduct a three-phase study on rock samples from the Horn River Basin (HRB) and the Duvernay (DUV) Formation, located in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. In the first phase, we measure baselines for water and kerosene imbibition into the rock samples by conducting spontaneous imbibition tests. In the second phase, we measure expansion of the rock samples during imbibition of water and kerosene, in separate tests, using a linear variable differential transformer (LVDT). In the third phase, we measure imbibition-induced tensile stress during water imbibition into the samples. The results show that both HRB and DUV shale samples imbibe more water than kerosene, due to water adsorption by clay minerals. Imbibition of water increases the porosity of the HRB and the DUV samples by up to 0.94 and 0.25 percentage points, respectively. Expansion of all samples is anisotropic, with higher expansion perpendicular to the depositional lamination. Water imbibition into the samples induces an expansive stress as high as 17 psi. Moreover, applying confining stress reduces the imbibition of water by up to 18.1% and 33.7% in the HRB and DUV samples, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Unconventional Resources ConferenceSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207