MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586276054 · doi:10.4000/ifha.8603

Enrico Natale, Christiane Sibille, Nicolas Chachereau, Patrick Kammerer, Manuel Hiestand (dir.), La Visualisation des données en histoire / Visualisierung von Daten in der Geschichtswissenschaft

2017· article· fr· W2586276054 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Perreaux

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesVisualizationComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dédié à la mémoire de l’historien Peter Haber (1964-2013), l’ensemble des treize contributions de ce volume se distingue du flot d’ouvrages récemment consacrés aux humanités numériques. Alors que la plupart de ces textes s'intéresse avant tout à des questions disciplinaires, La Visualisation des données en histoire aborde, en français, en allemand et en anglais, des méthodes et des difficultés concrètes – ces dernières étant d’ailleurs intimement liées à des réflexions abstraites. Présentés ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207