MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586280153 · doi:10.5539/jmbr.v7n1p9

Regulatory T-cell: Regulator of Host Defense in Infection

2017· article· en· W2586280153 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mousa Mohammadnia‐Afrouzi, Mehdi Shahbazi, Sedigheh Baleghi Damavandi, Ghasem Faghanzadeh Ganji, Soheil Ebrahimpour

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molecular Biology Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFOXP3Immune systemBiologyRegulatory T cellCell biologyT cellCytotoxic T cellImmunologyIL-2 receptorCD8RegulatorThymocyteInterleukin 21Natural killer T cellIn vitroGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on diverse activities and production of several cytokines, T lymphocytes and T helper cells are divided into Th1, Th2, Th17 and regulatory T-cell (T regs) subsets based on diverse activities and production of several cytokines. Infectious agents can escape from host by modulation of immune responses as effector T-cells and Tregs. Thus, regulatory T-cells play a critical role in suppression of immune responses to infectious agents such as viruses, bacteria, parasites and fungi and as well as preserving immune homeostasis. However, regulatory T-cell responses can advantageous for the body by minimizing the tissue-damaging effects. The following subsets of regulatory T-cells have been recognized: natural regulatory Tcells, Th3, Tr1, CD8+ Treg, natural killer like Treg (NKTreg) cells. Among various markers of Treg cells, Forkhead family transcription factor (FOXP3) as an intracellular protein is used for discrimination between activated T reg cells and activated T-cells. FOXP3 has a central role in production, thymocyte differentiation and function of regulatory Tcells. Several mechanisms have been indicated in regulation of T reg cells. As, the suppression of T-cells via regulatory T-cells is either mediated by Cell-cell contact and Immunosuppressive cytokines (TGF-Beta, IL-10) mediated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Molecular Biology ResearchSame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207