MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spectral Analysis of Platelet Oscillations in Cyclic Thrombocytopenia.

2009· article· en· W2586285374 on OpenAlexaff
Jayson Potts, Jane C. Moore, John G. Kelton, Brian Leber, Donald M. Arnold

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University Medical CentreMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEltrombopagPlateletThrombopoietinMedicineInternal medicineMean platelet volumeGastroenterologyImmune thrombocytopeniaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4459 Introduction Cyclic thrombocytopenia (CT) is a rare autoimmune condition characterized by predictable oscillations in platelet count levels. Periodic platelet cycles in CT have not been well characterized. Methods We studied three patients with wide platelet count fluctuations to identify patterns consistent with CT. Medical charts were reviewed and platelet levels and treatments were abstracted. Platelet counts were plotted over time for each patient. Spectral analyses were completed using the method of Lomb and Scargle to determine if platelet count fluctuations were random or had a stable period of oscillation. Where stable periods were identified (fixed time from peak to peak) the likelihood of those periods being random was calculated using the false-alarm probability. Results Regular periods of platelet oscillation were identified for each patient (Table 1). Periods varied between 23 and 42 days and were not random. Patient I had a 2-year remission induced by immune suppressive medications during which time the platelet count was normal and stable. Platelet count oscillation amplitudes were 350 ×109/L both at presentation of CT and at relapse. Gradual building and decaying of oscillations were noted at the onset of relapse, and remission, respectively. Patient II Matching a sine curve to the platelet data demonstrated that platelet nadirs of <20 ×109/L could be predicted to within 4 days for every cycle up to one year in advance. Patient III had typical CT oscillations for 6 years, but thereafter platelet fluctuations became random and no regular period was observed. Treatment with eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetic agent for 5 days resulted in a peak platelet count peak in excess of 1200 ×109/L in this patient. Conclusion In three patients with CT, we identified regular periodic oscillations in platelet counts that were non-random. Some patients have predictable cycles that may allow timed delivery of treatments such as TPO-mimetic agents. These findings may provide insight into the nature of the autoantibody in CT. Disclosures: Arnold: Hoffman-LaRoche: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207