MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2586288624 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa5e63

The correction of time and temperature effects in MR-based 3D Fricke xylenol orange dosimetry

2017· article· en· W2586288624 on OpenAlexafffund
Mattea Welch, David A. Jaffray

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPrincess Margaret Cancer Foundation
KeywordsXylenol orangeDosimetryNuclear medicineMaterials scienceMedicineChemistryNuclear chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Previously developed MR-based three-dimensional (3D) Fricke-xylenol orange (FXG) dosimeters can provide end-to-end quality assurance and validation protocols for pre-clinical radiation platforms. FXG dosimeters quantify ionizing irradiation induced oxidation of Fe 2+ ions using pre- and post-irradiation MR imaging methods that detect changes in spin-lattice relaxation rates ( R 1 = T 1 − 1 ) caused by irradiation induced oxidation of Fe 2+ . Chemical changes in MR-based FXG dosimeters that occur over time and with changes in temperature can decrease dosimetric accuracy if they are not properly characterized and corrected. This paper describes the characterization, development and utilization of an empirical model-based correction algorithm for time and temperature effects in the context of a pre-clinical irradiator and a 7 T pre-clinical MR imaging system. Time and temperature dependent changes of R 1 values were characterized using variable TR spin-echo imaging. R 1 -time and R 1 -temperature dependencies were fit using non-linear least squares fitting methods. Models were validated using leave-one-out cross-validation and resampling. Subsequently, a correction algorithm was developed that employed the previously fit empirical models to predict and reduce baseline R 1 shifts that occurred in the presence of time and temperature changes. The correction algorithm was tested on R 1 -dose response curves and 3D dose distributions delivered using a small animal irradiator at 225 kVp. The correction algorithm reduced baseline R 1 shifts from −2.8 × 10 −2 s −1 to 1.5 × 10 −3 s −1 . In terms of absolute dosimetric performance as assessed with traceable standards, the correction algorithm reduced dose discrepancies from approximately 3% to approximately 0.5% (2.90 ± 2.08% to 0.20 ± 0.07%, and 2.68 ± 1.84% to 0.46 ± 0.37% for the 10 × 10 and 8 × 12 mm 2 fields, respectively). Chemical changes in MR-based FXG dosimeters produce time and temperature dependent R 1 values for the time intervals and temperature changes found in a typical small animal imaging and irradiation laboratory setting. These changes cause baseline R 1 shifts that negatively affect dosimeter accuracy. Characterization, modeling and correction of these effects improved in-field reported dose accuracy to less than 1% when compared to standardized ion chamber measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and Biology→Same topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→