MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586315664 · doi:10.1115/imece2016-65253

The Orbitless Drive

2016· article· en· W2586315664 on OpenAlexaff
Leo Stocco

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 14: Emerging Technologies; Materials: Genetics to Structures; Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPinionHarshnessVibrationNoise, vibration, and harshnessTorqueReduction (mathematics)Drive shaftGear ratioNoise reductionEngineeringAutomotive engineeringAcousticsPhysicsMechanical engineeringMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fixed low-ratio Epicyclic drive is developed that resembles a Planetary drive but has crank-shaft pinions and an additional carrier replacing its ring gear. It provides half the reduction ratio of a Planetary drive with similar pinions, making reduction ratios at or near 2:1 practical. It shares many properties with a Planetary drive such as torque splitting and co-axial drive shafts that spin in a common direction but with no ring gear, reverse bending, or assembly criteria. It has many optional configurations and modes, does not slip or jam, is easily back-driven, has low pitch and bearing velocities, and favorable churning properties. It is a viable option for both reduction and overdrive applications that promises low noise / vibration / harshness (NVH) levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 14: Emerging Technologies; Materials: Genetics to Structures; Safety Engineering and Risk AnalysisSame topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207