MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586318013 · doi:10.1038/icb.2017.8

Targeting A2 adenosine receptors in cancer

2017· review· en· W2586318013 on OpenAlexaff
David Allard, Martin Turcotte, John Stagg

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunology and Cell Biology · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdenosineAdenosine receptorTumor microenvironmentImmune systemReceptorBiologyCancer researchPurinergic signallingPharmacologyMedicineImmunologyBiochemistryAgonist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tumor cells use various ways to evade anti-tumor immune responses. Adenosine, a potent immunosuppressive metabolite, is often found elevated in the extracellular tumor microenvironment. Therefore, targeting adenosine-generating enzymes (CD39 and CD73) or adenosine receptors has emerged as a novel means to stimulate anti-tumor immunity. In particular, the A2 (A2a and A2b) adenosine receptors exhibit similar immunosuppressive and pro-angiogenic functions, yet have distinct biological roles in cancer. In this review, we describe the common and distinct biological consequences of A2a and A2b adenosine receptor signaling in cancer. We discuss recent pre-clinical studies and summarize the different mechanisms-of-action of adenosine-targeting drugs. We also review the rationale for combining inhibitors of the adenosine pathway with other anticancer therapies such immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor vaccines, chemotherapy and adoptive T cell therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations111
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunology and Cell BiologySame topicAdenosine and Purinergic SignalingFrench-language works237,207