Crossed Hands Curve Saccades: Multisensory Dynamics in Saccade Trajectories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crossing one's hands across the midline can interfere with multisensory processing.The current experiment examines this effect in a dynamic framework.Participants were asked to saccade to visual targets in the presence of a manual tactile distraction on the same or opposite side of the target and with hands crossed or uncrossed.Trajectories of the resulting visual saccades were analyzed for curvature.While spatially incongruent trials in an uncrossed position resulted in marginal saccade curvature, the crossed hand condition caused significant curvature when compared to control trials regardless of spatial configuration.Thus, the current study provides evidence that the role of sensory integration in eye movement dynamics is modulated by relative positioning of the hands.Moreover, the findings indicate that saccades can deviate in the presence of crossed-hand stimulation regardless of the spatial configuration of the trial.These results provide an initial link between known multisensory phenomena and saccade trajectories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".