MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586341834 · doi:10.2118/182597-ms

CO2 Water-Alternating-Gas Flooding Optimization of the Chigwell Viking I Pool in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin

2017· article· en· W2586341834 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Simulation Conference · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControllabilityMaximizationNet present valueEnvironmental scienceProduction (economics)Petroleum engineeringMathematical optimizationHydrology (agriculture)MathematicsGeologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An ensemble-based production optimization technique is applied to a simulation model of OMERS Energy's Chigwell Viking ‘I’ Pool in order to determine optimal CO2-WAG cycle length, injection rates and production bottom hole pressures (BHPs). An ensemble-based approximate gradient calculation is used in an expected net present value (NPV) maximization. A single model was fist used to contrast the individual optimization of injection rates and the injection cycle lengths with the combined optimization of rates and WAG cycle lengths in order to determine the best parameters to consider for WAG optimization. By combining cycle length, injection rate and production BHP controls, a significant increase in the NPV is observed relative to using injection rate and production BHP control only. The model's non-uniform well placement and geological properties require full individual controllability of the wells to realize the optimal sweep. The controllability offered by combining cycle length, injection rates and production BHP as controls for individual wells is seen to lead to solutions where some wells are under gas-only injection and other wells are under water-only injection for some time. The obtained solutions in general require fewer switches between injection phases and therefore offer a reduction of the operational costs and risks. The optimization workflow and control parameterization are also applied to an ensemble of model realizations obtained by generating samples of the uncertain model parameters. The improvements in expected NPV demonstrate the practical applicability of ensemble-based approaches for optimization under uncertainty to real field cases. If CO2 storage credits are added to the objective function, a different control strategy is found that also leads to an increase in NPV. This result highlights the potential for economic incentives to increase both CO2 storage and oil recovery. We also demonstrate that the availability of CO2 (or, similarly, its price) will influence the optimal strategy, and therefore that strategies that work in one CO2 availability/price scenario may not necessarily be optimal in another one. The techniques discussed in this paper, however, can be applied to determine the optimal strategy for each particular operational scenario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it