MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586461115 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2017.2665472

Cell Switch-Off for Networks Deployed With Variable Spatial Regularity

2017· article· en· W2586461115 on OpenAlexafffund
Faraj Lagum, Quoc-Nam Le-The, Tamer Beitelmal, Sebastian S. Szyszkowicz, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGreedy algorithmComputer scienceCellular networkEnergy (signal processing)Variable (mathematics)Set (abstract data type)Efficient energy useEnergy consumptionComputer networkAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cell switch-off (CSO) is considered to be a promising approach to reducing the energy consumed by cellular networks. In this letter, we set a new CSO research direction that focuses on saving energy and increasing the performance of a network-deployed with variable amounts of spatial regularity-by switching off some cells so as to maximize the spatial regularity of the remaining active cells. We propose three greedy algorithms for tackling this new problem. Improving the spatial regularity using a greedy algorithm results in either: (1) much extra energy could be saved while maintaining network performance or (2) saving the same amount of energy as the random CSO with better network performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207