MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586470021

IMEX extensions of linear multistep methods with general monotonicity and boundedness properties

2006· article· en· W2586470021 on OpenAlexaff
Willem Hundsdorfer, Steven J. Ruuth

Bibliographic record

VenueCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods for differential equations
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonotonic functionMathematicsLinear multistep methodRunge–Kutta methodsApplied mathematicsRelaxation (psychology)Stability (learning theory)Numerical methods for ordinary differential equationsNumerical analysisMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisComputer scienceDifferential equationOrdinary differential equation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For solving hyperbolic systems with stiff sources or relaxation terms, time stepping methods should combine favorable monotonicity properties for shocks and steep solution gradients with good stability properties for stiff terms. In this paper we consider implicit-explicit (IMEX) multistep methods. Suitable methods will be constructed, based on explicit methods with general monotonicity and boundedness properties for hyperbolic equations. Numerical comparisons are made with several implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta methods

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the NetherlandsSame topicNumerical methods for differential equationsFrench-language works237,207