Liberating Education: The Dissident Voice of a Good Enough School
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study develops a concept of the Good Enough School inspired by Freire’s (1997) Liberating Education and Dussel’s (1977) Philosophy of Liberation in response to policies and practices that reduce the focus of education to a mere performance on national and international tests, and the search for first places on rankings. We criticize educational models that minimize important educational dimensions, such as qualification (learning of formal knowledge), humanization, democratization and transcendentalism, that are essential to the construction of another model of social and economic development. The Good Enough School is based on the ethics of otherness and assumes the importance of decolonization processes in the ways of being, thinking and acting. It is oriented towards dealing with personal, social, local and global challenges through potential spaces (Winnicott, 1975) that ensure the care of children and young people who were not socialized in a good enough environment, and spaces of appearance (Arendt, 2007), which ensure the political exercise of citizenship and democracy to the school community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.079 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.017 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".