MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586495303 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2017.2664045

Implementation of Sparse Superposition Codes

2017· article· en· W2586495303 on OpenAlexaff
Carlo Condo, Warren J. Gross

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsComputer scienceEncoderCode wordEncoding (memory)AlgorithmCode (set theory)Superposition principleThroughputError detection and correctionSet (abstract data type)Parallel computingComputer engineeringTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsWirelessTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sparse superposition codes (SSCs) are capacity achieving codes whose decoding process is a linear sensing problem. Decoding approaches thus exploit the approximate message passing algorithm, which has been proven to be effective in compressing sensing. Previous work from the authors has evaluated the error correction performance of SSCs under finite precision and finite code length. This paper proposes the first SSC encoder and decoder architectures in the literature. The architectures are parametrized and applicable to all SSCs: A set of wide-ranging case studies is then considered, and code-specific approximations, along with implementation results in 65 nm CMOS technology, are then provided. The encoding process can be carried out with low power consumption (≤2.103 mW), while the semi-parallel decoder architecture can reach a throughput of 1.3 Gb/s with a 768 × 6-bit SSC codeword and an area occupation of 2.43 mm2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207