Design of an Innovative Solar Updraft Aeration System for Fish Ponds in the Developing World Using Thermofluidic Computational Modelling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces an innovative design concept for a low-cost solar-thermal aeration system for fish ponds which is amenable to implementation in resource-constrained settings. In its most basic form, the system consists of a metallic solar thermal collector and a heat transfer column (referred to as conduction element in this paper), which induces convective circulation by dissipating heat to the cooler, deeper layers of the pond. As a result of the circulation, oxygen generated by phytoplankton at the top of the pond is distributed throughout the water column, preventing oxygen losses to the atmosphere due to surface supersaturation and increasing the overall dissolved oxygen (DO) content in the pond. This paper presents a design study to evaluate different system configurations. Thermofluidic numerical models were implemented to systematically analyze and compare the mass flow rate through the draft tube induced by convection. Furthermore, parametric studies were performed to evaluate the effect of the insulation patch length and the aluminum plate thickness on the overall performance of the device (i.e. the induced mass flow rate through the draft tube). It was found that the two-fin configuration with split conduction elements was superior to the central rod design in terms of performance. In addition, it was found that depending on the insulation patch length, the induced mass flow rates can be increased up to 5 times. The results from the computational models indicate that the device can induce the convective circulation in order to improve the DO content at deep levels of the ponds and has potential to improve aquaculture productivity in resource-constrained settings. The results from this study will be used to configure systems for future field evaluations that will be performed in fish ponds in Bangladesh.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".