MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586617990 · doi:10.2495/safe-v6-n4-764-776

The Socio-Ecological analytical framework of water scarcity in rafsanjan township, Iran

2016· article· en· W2586617990 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sara Mehryar, Richard Sliuzas, Ali Mohammad Sharifi, M.F.A.M. van Maarseveen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScarcityWater scarcityWater resource managementEnvironmental planningEcologyEnvironmental scienceWater resourcesEconomicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ground water scarcity is a main socio-ecological challenge in the Middle East. While ground water reserves seem vast, the impacts of over-exploitation and inadequate control over water consumption may threaten the sustainability of aquifers. The signs of aquifer depletion and its influence on water accessibility have become apparent in recent years. Using the case of Rafsanjan Township, Iran, this study aims to understand the socio-ecological factors and their inter-relationships in driving and exacerbating the water crisis situation, the ongoing policy responses and the possible consequences of current trends. The Drivers, Pressures, State, Impacts and Responses (DPSIR) framework, developed by the European Environmental Agency in 1999, is used to analyze the components of the socio-ecological system. Inputs are generated through a time series analysis of Landsat images, extracted spatial datasets, secondary literature and government reports.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207