MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586679309 · doi:10.7203/imago.8.9153

La representació de l’arbre en l’Arbre de ciència de Ramon Llull

2017· article· ca· W2586679309 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Bonner, Albert Soler

Bibliographic record

VenueIMAGO Revista de Emblemática y Cultura Visual · 2017
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of Medieval Iberia
Canadian institutionsMonsanto (Canada)
FundersMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: The abundant use of graphic material in the work of Ramon Llull makes for a space where words and images intersect. The figure of the tree which Llull describes verbally in his Arbre de ciència (1295-1296) is a complex and special case of the application of a rhetorical device called «ekphrasis». Despite the fact that the author did not envisage the possibility of making a visual representation, in the work's later transmission attempts were made to provide graphic images with results which were unsatisfactory for many reasons, of which the most important was the fact that Llull conceived of his tree as multidimensional. KEYWORDS: Llull; tree; ekphrasis. RESUM: L’ús abundant de recursos gràfics en l’obra de Ramon Llull és un lloc de confluència de paraula i imatge. L’esquema arbori que Llull descriu verbalment al seu Arbre de ciència (1295-1296) és un cas complex i particular d’aplicació del recurs retòric anomenat «ècfrasi». Malgrat que originalment l’autor no va preveure la possibilitat de fer-ne una representació visual, en el procés de transmissió de l’obra hom va assajar en diverses ocasions de fer-ne una plasmació gràfica amb resultats decebedors per múltiples raons, la més important de les quals és que Llull va concebre un arbre multidimensional.PARAULES CLAUS: Llull; arbre; ècfrasi. RESUMEN: El uso abundante de recursos gráficos en la obra de Ramon Llull es un lugar de confluencia de palabra e imagen. El esquema arbóreo que Llull describe verbalment en su Arbre de ciència (1295-1296) es un caso complejo y particular de aplicación del recurso retórico llamado «écfrasis». A pesar de que originariamente el autor no previó la posibilidad de hacer una representación visual, en el proceso de transmisión de la obra se intentó en diverses ocasiones hacer una plasmación gràfica con resultados decepcionantes por múltiples razones, la más importante de las cuales es que Llull concibió un árbol multidimensional. PALABRAS CLAVES: Llull; árbol; écfrasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIMAGO Revista de Emblemática y Cultura VisualSame topicHistorical Studies of Medieval IberiaFrench-language works237,207