MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mapping the Seasonal Variations of Chlorophyll Concentrations in the Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman Using MODIS Satellite Data

2014· article· en· W2586707113 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdelgadir Abuelgasim, Naeema Alhosani

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpwellingOceanographyPhytoplanktonCurrent (fluid)Chlorophyll aWater massEnvironmental scienceGeologyOcean currentSatelliteChlorophyllPrimary productivityClimatologyNutrientBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arabian Gulf is a semi-enclosed large water body that experiences seasonal variations and reversal of its water currents’ flow circulation. The waters of the Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman are characterized by high primary productivity and strong phytoplankton blooms at different times of the year. This research uses MODIS/AQUA chlorophyll concentrations of the two gulfs, along with water- and air-current patterns, to identify the factors and mechanisms that regulate the variations of these chlorophyll concentrations. The study's major findings are that observed chlorophyll concentrations are strongly correlated with wind and water current movement on both gulfs. Further, chlorophyll concentrations in the Arabian Gulf begin to increase in August and reach a peak in December as a result of the upwelling of bottom water currents driven by the north- to north-westerly wind currents, or summer shamals, from June through August. In the Gulf of Oman and the north-eastern Arabian Sea, by contrast, chlorop...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207