MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586723043 · doi:10.3324/haematol.2016.157495

Deltex-1 mutations predict poor survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

2017· letter· en· W2586723043 on OpenAlexafffund
Leo Meriranta, Annika Pasanen, Riku Louhimo, Alejandra Cervera, Amjad Alkodsi, Matias Autio, Minna Taskinen, Ville Rantanen, Marja-Liisa Karjalainen-Lindsberg, Harald Holte, Jan Delabie, Rainer Lehtonen, Sampsa Hautaniemi, Sirpa Leppä

Bibliographic record

VenueHaematologica · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Cancer InstituteUniversity of TorontoHelsingin Yliopisto
KeywordsDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaLymphomaCancer researchMutationBiologyInternal medicineGeneticsOncologyMedicineImmunologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a group of clinically aggressive and heterogeneous malignancies, of which approximately 60% can be cured with anthracycline-based chemoimmunotherapy. Based on gene expression profiling, DLBCL can be classified into two molecularly distinct subgroups showing

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHaematologicaSame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207