MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586724844 · doi:10.1109/mitp.2017.12

Mobile DNUN: Danger Notification and User Navigation

2017· article· en· W2586724844 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIT Professional · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeolocationComputer scienceKey (lock)Location-based serviceMobile deviceMobile computingEntertainmentGlobal Positioning SystemComputer securityWorld Wide WebMultimediaTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today's mobile applications are playing a key role in the IT world, encompassing various fields such as sports, entertainment, health and sciences, and games. This article describes the Danger Notification and User Navigation (DNUN) application, which works in conjunction with a geolocation system to save and navigate to an object's location for immediate or later use from anywhere on Earth. It notifies other contacts about a user's location through either broadcast or multicast communications. DNUN also notifies application users about an object's location when they have forgotten it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it