MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2586819589 · doi:10.15173/mjc.v11i0.1412

Tackling the New Rules for Social Media and Measurement: Critical Book Review

2016· article· en· W2586819589 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rebecca S. Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe McMaster Journal of Communication · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Relations and Crisis Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)Social mediaTask (project management)Key (lock)Advice (programming)SociologyPublic relationsComputer sciencePolitical scienceWorld Wide WebManagementArtificial intelligenceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a critical review of two books: The new rules of marketing and public relations (3rd ed.) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 318 pages) and Measure what matters: Online tools for understanding customers, social media, engagement and key relationships (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 222 pages). The first book provides excellent advice on social media tactics and strategies. The latter expresses the importance of measurement and demonstrates how to effectively complete this task across a variety of platforms. The reviewer examines how the advice of both authors is beneficial to the daily role of the public relations practitioner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe McMaster Journal of CommunicationSame topicPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationFrench-language works237,207