Sarcolipin expression is not required for the mitochondrial enzymatic response to physical activity or diet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In mice, transgenic manipulation of Ca2+-handling proteins is sufficient to alter the metabolic phenotype of muscle. We have previously shown that ablation of sarcolipin (SLN), a regulatory protein and uncoupler of sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPases, leads to excessive diet-induced obesity and glucose intolerance in mice. However, it is unclear how loss of SLN per se affects muscle oxidative capacity and the ability of mitochondria to adapt to physiological stimuli, such as exercise training or calorie overload. To address this question, Sln−/−and wild-type (WT) littermates were given access to voluntary running wheels or underwent a treadmill training protocol for 8 wk. Furthermore, a separate group of mice were given a high-fat diet (42% kcal from fat for 8 wk) to determine whether the excessively obese phenotype of Sln−/−mice is associated with altered oxidative capacity. While voluntary running was insufficient to elicit mitochondrial adaptations, treadmill-trained mice showed significant increases ( P < 0.05) in the maximal activities of succinate dehydrogenase (+11%), citrate synthase (+12%), cytochrome oxidase (COX: +17%), along with increased protein expression of cytochrome c (+34%) and COX IV (+28%), which were irrespective of SLN expression. Lastly, no changes in the activities of mitochondrial marker enzymes existed with high-fat feeding, regardless of genotype. Together, these findings indicate that SLN is not required for the regulation of oxidative capacity in response to physiological stress, namely exercise or caloric surfeit. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sarcolipin (SLN) has gained considerable attention for its uncoupling role of sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA). Because of SLN’s ability to alter both cellular energy use and cytosolic [Ca2+], the potential exists for a regulatory role of mitochondrial biogenesis. Herein, we show skeletal muscle oxidative capacity to be unaltered in mice lacking SLN following exercise training or high-fat feeding. Our results contrast with published studies of SLN-overexpressing mice, possibly owing to supraphysiological uncoupling of SERCA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".